Davis v. Searle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Davis v. Searle

69 S.E. 1086, 8 Ga. App. 553, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 41

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 24, 1911·No. 2549·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. The verdict, of-the jury settles all issues of fact; and there is some evidence to sustain it.

2. The alleged prejudicial remark of the court in confining the investigation to relevant matters constitutes no reversible error.

3. For the court t.o send out the appeal papers in an appeal case with the jury trying the ease is not erroneous.

4. It is not erroneous for the court to allow a party voluntarily to write off a portion of his claim or of his recovery, though he thereby renders some alleged error harmless. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

1. The verdict, of-the jury settles all issues of fact; and there is some evidence to sustain it.

2. The alleged prejudicial remark of the court in confining the investigation to relevant matters constitutes no reversible error.

3. For the court t.o send out the appeal papers in an appeal case with the jury trying the ease is not erroneous.

4. It is not erroneous for the court to allow a party voluntarily to write off a portion of his claim or of his recovery, though he thereby renders some alleged error harmless. Judgment affirmed.

Davis v. Searle, 69 S.E. 1086, 8 Ga. App. 553, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 41 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

69 S.E. 1086 (Davis v. Searle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.