Davis v. Schaad
This text of 376 A.2d 22 (Davis v. Schaad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a small claims appeal. Trial court gave judgment in favor of the landowner, Davis, with respect to damages to her lawn arising from trespassing cattle belonging to defendant Schaad. Both parties represented themselves.
The appeal here is directed at the measure of evidence supporting the judgment. It is apparent that the testimony was conflicting. It was, therefore, for the trier of fact to resolve, and without a showing that the result he reached was without evidentiary support, it must stand. Stearns v. Sugarbush Valley Corp., 130 Vt. 472, 474-75, 296 A.2d 220 (1972).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 A.2d 22, 135 Vt. 254, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-schaad-vt-1977.