Mr. Justice McSurely
delivered the opinion of the court.
Abstract of the Decision. 1. Injunction, § 162*—when granting of order for without notice is improper. That an order of injunction was granted without notice is ground for reversal, unless it appeared from the bill and affidavit that the rights' of complainant would have been unduly prejudiced if the injunction had not been issued immediately or without notice. 2. Injunction, § 162*—when granted without notice. To justify the issuance of an injunction without notice, it is not sufficient to state conclusions of prejudice, but facts must be stated from which the court can draw the conclusion that an immediate injunction without notice is necessary to save complainant from harm. 3. Injunction, § 67*—when will not be granted because seeking specific performance of contract. An injunction which, in. effect, seeks the specific performance of a contract for the construction of a building, involving the preparation of plans and specifications by the court and the superintendence of their carrying out, "will not be granted. 4. Injunction, § 13*—when denial proper because of adequate remedy at law. An injunction which seeks to have a court of chancery deliver to complainant possession of premises described in a lease from defendant will not be granted, complainant having an adequate remedy at law. Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI