Davis v. Roadheaver
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7746
BENJAMIN DAVIS, III,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
W. ROADHEAVER, Cpl.; SOLSTICE, Cpl.; TYLER, Capt.; DURST, Lt.,; LLEWELYN, Lt.; CROSS, Sgt., Individually and in their Official Capacities,
Defendants – Appellees,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-01936-WDQ)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Davis, III, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Davis, III, appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Roadheaver, No.
1:09-cv-01936-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2010); Davis v. Roadheaver,
No. 1:09-cv-01936-WDQ (D. Md. July 16, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Roadheaver (Davis v. Roadheaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.