Davis v. Roadheaver

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. Roadheaver. Read the opinion of the Court — 421 F. App'x 289
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2011·No. 10-7746·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7746

BENJAMIN DAVIS, III,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

W. ROADHEAVER, Cpl.; SOLSTICE, Cpl.; TYLER, Capt.; DURST, Lt.,; LLEWELYN, Lt.; CROSS, Sgt., Individually and in their Official Capacities,

Defendants – Appellees,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Party-in-Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-01936-WDQ)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Davis, III, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Davis, III, appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Roadheaver, No.

1:09-cv-01936-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2010); Davis v. Roadheaver,

No. 1:09-cv-01936-WDQ (D. Md. July 16, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Roadheaver, (4th Cir. 2011).

Davis v. Roadheaver (Davis v. Roadheaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related