Davis v. Ritchie
85 Mo. 501
Opinion
We reverse the judgment in this cause because the amendment, consisting as it did ia striking out the name of Davis as co-plaintiff, was an amendment which did not change the original cause of action, in the smallest particular and was an amendment perfectly competent to make under the liberal provisions of section 3060, Revised Statutes, 1879. Therefore, judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Ritchie, 85 Mo. 501 (Mo. 1885).
85 Mo. 501 (Davis v. Ritchie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Zane
148 S.W. 967 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1912)
Slaughter v. Davenport
51 S.W. 471 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
Robinson v. Kind
47 P. 977 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1896)
Sprague v. Follett
90 Mo. 547 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1886)