Davis v. Reilly

223 F. App'x 236
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 5, 2007·No. No. 06-7858·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Lee Davis, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Reilly, No. 3:05-cv-00075-WCB (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Reilly, 223 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2007).

223 F. App'x 236 (Davis v. Reilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241