Davis v. Prack

998 N.E.2d 393, 22 N.Y.3d 910, 2013 NY Slip Op 88254, 975 N.Y.S.2d 730, 2013 WL 5614341, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2816
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 15, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 998 N.E.2d 393 (Davis v. Prack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Prack, 998 N.E.2d 393, 22 N.Y.3d 910, 2013 NY Slip Op 88254, 975 N.Y.S.2d 730, 2013 WL 5614341, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2816 (N.Y. 2013).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division judgment, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Eaton v State of New York, 76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument and reconsideration, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eaton v. State
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
998 N.E.2d 393, 22 N.Y.3d 910, 2013 NY Slip Op 88254, 975 N.Y.S.2d 730, 2013 WL 5614341, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-prack-ny-2013.