Davis v. Prack
998 N.E.2d 393, 22 N.Y.3d 910, 2013 NY Slip Op 88254, 975 N.Y.S.2d 730, 2013 WL 5614341, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2816
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division judgment, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Eaton v State of New York, 76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument and reconsideration, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Prack, 998 N.E.2d 393, 22 N.Y.3d 910, 2013 NY Slip Op 88254, 975 N.Y.S.2d 730, 2013 WL 5614341, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2816 (N.Y. 2013).
998 N.E.2d 393 (Davis v. Prack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eaton v. State
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)