Davis v. Pettiford

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 26, 2009
Docket08-7579
StatusUnpublished

This text of Davis v. Pettiford (Davis v. Pettiford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Pettiford, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7579

JOSEPH ANDREW DAVIS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL PETTIFORD, Warden,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (0:07-cv-01670-TLW)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Andrew Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Andrew Davis, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Davis v. Pettiford, No. 0:07-cv-01670-

TLW (D.S.C. July 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davis v. Pettiford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-pettiford-ca4-2009.