Davis v. Peel

22 S.E. 525, 97 Ga. 342
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 8, 1895·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where the trial of a case in which two persons were plaintiffs, and a corporation and its creditors were defendants, resulted in a verdict and decree, giving to certain of the creditors special liens on the property of the corporation, and the plaintiffs made a motion for a new trial, to the overruling of which they excepted, but failed to serve with the bill of exceptions one of the parties who obtained a special lien by virtue of the verdict and decree, though that party was named in the bill of exceptions as a party defendant, a motion to dismiss the writ of error for want of service on such defendant will be sustained, he being an indispensable party.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Peel, 22 S.E. 525, 97 Ga. 342 (Ga. 1895).

22 S.E. 525 (Davis v. Peel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler v. Kendrick
158 S.E. 13 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Griffith
36 S.E. 859 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Inman, Smith & Co. v. Estes
30 S.E. 800 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Capers v. Kirkpatrick
25 S.E. 438 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)