Davis v. Ostrander
This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 106 (Davis v. Ostrander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not a bond for the payment of money, and not within the act of congress on this subject, and therefore need not be stamped.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Note. On the application of the clerk for the direction of the court on the question, whether powers of attorney in suits depending in this court, ought to be received without being stamped,
The Court said, that such powers need not be stamped, and that the above mentioned act applies to general letters of attorney only.
See Burns v. Baker, infra, 134. Conry v. Warren, infra, vol. 3, 259.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Johns. Cas. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-ostrander-nysupct-1799.