Davis v. O'Connell
This text of 47 So. 672 (Davis v. O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case is controlled by the case of Melsheimer v. McKnight, post -, 46 South., 827, as to the right of the trustee to name the time and place of sale.
It only remains for us to say that Code 1906, § 2772, providing that sale of lands under deed of trust shall be advertised for three consecutive weeks preceding the sale in a newspaper published in the county, etc., has no application to instruments executed before its enactment.
The former judgment reversing this case is vacated, and a judgment now ordered to be entered affirming the case.
Affirmed.
“The reporter has treated the briefs of counsel in this case, filed on a suggestion of error to the vacated judgment, as if filed before the first and vacated decision was rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 So. 672, 92 Miss. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-oconnell-miss-1908.