Davis v. North Carolina

534 F. App'x 185
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 2013
DocketNos. 13-1627, 13-1715
StatusPublished

This text of 534 F. App'x 185 (Davis v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. North Carolina, 534 F. App'x 185 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, II, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Emergency Motion for Return of Child Under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241-2254” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006). Davis also appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to appoint counsel and motion to stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. North Carolina, No. 4:13-cv-00055-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. May 6, 2013; May 14, 2013). We deny Davis’ motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)
Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 F. App'x 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-north-carolina-ca4-2013.