Davis v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
This text of 23 N.Y.S. 358 (Davis v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The death of the plaintiff’s intestate was occasioned by the same accident which occasioned the injury to George Gerbig, whose case was heard upon appeal in the court at the last December (1892) term. 22 N. Y. Supp. 21. The questions put to the witness Ferguson, a civil engineer, calling for his opinion as to the safety of the crib which gave way and caused the accident, are similar in principle to the questions considered in the Gerbig Case. It was therein held that the questions admitted assumed the functions of the jury upon questions of fact. The judgment and order refusing a new trial should be reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the opinion in the Gerbig Case.
DYKMAN, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 N.Y.S. 358, 69 Hun 174, 76 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 174, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-new-york-lake-erie-western-railroad-nysupct-1893.