Davis v. Navy Federal Credit Union

Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Navy Federal Credit Union

474 F. App'x 398

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2012·No. No. 12-1485·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Karen L. Davis appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing her employment discrimination complaint and amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Navy Fed. Credit Union, No. l:ll-cv-01282-JCC-TCB, 2012 WL 73238 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2012) & 2012 WL 948428 (Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Karen L. Davis appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing her employment discrimination complaint and amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Navy Fed. Credit Union, No. l:ll-cv-01282-JCC-TCB, 2012 WL 73238 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2012) & 2012 WL 948428 (Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Davis v. Navy Federal Credit Union, 474 F. App'x 398 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 398 (Davis v. Navy Federal Credit Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.