Davis v. National Council of Negro Women, Inc.

District of Columbia

Davis v. National Council of Negro Women, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedOctober 21, 2011

DocketCivil Action No. 2010-0002

StatusPublished

This text of Davis v. National Council of Negro Women, Inc. (Davis v. National Council of Negro Women, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. National Council of Negro Women, Inc., (D.D.C. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) ALFREDA V. DAVIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Acti0n N0. 10-0002 (RCL) v. ) ) NATIONAL COUNCIL OF. ) NEGRO WOMEN, INC., et al., ) ) F I L E D Defendants. ) ) OCT 2 1 2011 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy ORDER Courts for the District of Columb|a

This Court on September 21, 2011 signed an Order [41] that, inter alia, required plaintiff to return "the sum certain received and at issue, within 30 days of the issuance of this Order,"l or face dismissal of her case with prejudice The Court on October 21, 2011 received a Notice [43] from plaintiffs counsel that plaintiff is unable to comply with the terms of that Order by returning the sum certain at issue. Accordingly, and pursuant to the terms of the September 21, 2011 Order, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’ s case be DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice

Contemporaneously with its September 21, 2011 Order, the Court issued a Memorandum explaining the Court’s reasoning. The Court ordered that the memorandum be filed under seal,

"in order to preserve what remains of any confidentiality" in the mediation process, until after

' The Court’s Order referenced in vague terms a "sum certain received and at issue" in order to preserve whatever remained of any confidentiality in the mediation process before the merits judge As discussed below, the Court will order the unsealing of its Memorandum accompanying the September 21, 20ll Order, which explains that the "sum certain received and at issue" was a payment tendered by defendant to plaintiff, purportedly in settlement of plaintiffs claims against defendant, that plaintiff retained despite taking the position that the parties had not settled those claims.

resolution of the case on the merits. Because the Court has ordered that the case be dismissed with prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that the Memorandum be unsealed, and a copy placed on

the public docket.

so oRnERED this ?/" day of october 2011.

Q¢c~f~.£a%u

RoYcE c. LAMBERTH Chief Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) ALFREDA V. DAVIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Acti0n N0. 10-0002 (RCL) v. ) ) NATIONAL COUNCIL OF. ) NEGRO WOMEN, INC., et al., ) ) F I L E D Defendants. ) ) OCT 2 1 2011 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy ORDER Courts for the District of Columb|a

This Court on September 21, 2011 signed an Order [41] that, inter alia, required plaintiff to return "the sum certain received and at issue, within 30 days of the issuance of this Order,"l or face dismissal of her case with prejudice The Court on October 21, 2011 received a Notice [43] from plaintiffs counsel that plaintiff is unable to comply with the terms of that Order by returning the sum certain at issue. Accordingly, and pursuant to the terms of the September 21, 2011 Order, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’ s case be DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice

Contemporaneously with its September 21, 2011 Order, the Court issued a Memorandum explaining the Court’s reasoning. The Court ordered that the memorandum be filed under seal,

"in order to preserve what remains of any confidentiality" in the mediation process, until after

' The Court’s Order referenced in vague terms a "sum certain received and at issue" in order to preserve whatever remained of any confidentiality in the mediation process before the merits judge As discussed below, the Court will order the unsealing of its Memorandum accompanying the September 21, 20ll Order, which explains that the "sum certain received and at issue" was a payment tendered by defendant to plaintiff, purportedly in settlement of plaintiffs claims against defendant, that plaintiff retained despite taking the position that the parties had not settled those claims.

resolution of the case on the merits. Because the Court has ordered that the case be dismissed with prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that the Memorandum be unsealed, and a copy placed on

the public docket.

so oRnERED this ?/" day of october 2011.

Q¢c~f~.£a%u

RoYcE c. LAMBERTH Chief Judge United States District Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Davis v. National Council of Negro Women, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-national-council-of-negro-women-inc-dcd-2011.