Davis v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 22, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-00685·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9) MARTHA DAVIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00685-JLT-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 12 | MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL COMPANY, PROCEDURE 13 Defendant. (ECF No. 47) 14 15 On September 21, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice 16 | and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 47.) In light of the stipulation of 17 | dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 18 | Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 19 | award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 21 | the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 22 74 IT IS SO ORDERED. TA. ee 74 | Dated: _ September 22, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Davis v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (Davis v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)