Davis v. Murtagh

44 A.D.2d 798, 356 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5091

Opinion

Motion in the nature of mandamus to require respondent to render a decision in a matter.pending-before him unanimously denied, without costs and without disbursements, and the petition dismissed. It appears that the predicate matter has never been before respondent and, if not decided, is pending before another Justice of the court. The denial is without prejudice to a proper application. Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, .Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Murtagh, 44 A.D.2d 798, 356 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

44 A.D.2d 798 (Davis v. Murtagh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.