Davis v. Murtagh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis v. Murtagh

44 A.D.2d 798, 356 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5091

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 798 (Davis v. Murtagh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Murtagh, 44 A.D.2d 798, 356 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion in the nature of mandamus to require respondent to render a decision in a matter.pending-before him unanimously denied, without costs and without disbursements, and the petition dismissed. It appears that the predicate matter has never been before respondent and, if not decided, is pending before another Justice of the court. The denial is without prejudice to a proper application. Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, .Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion in the nature of mandamus to require respondent to render a decision in a matter.pending-before him unanimously denied, without costs and without disbursements, and the petition dismissed. It appears that the predicate matter has never been before respondent and, if not decided, is pending before another Justice of the court. The denial is without prejudice to a proper application. Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, .Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 798, 356 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-murtagh-nyappdiv-1974.