Davis v. Murray

37 F.3d 1493, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34821, 1994 WL 558248
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 13, 1994·No. 94-6681·Published

Opinion

37 F.3d 1493
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David S. DAVIS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY; R.A. Young; R.J. Beck; Janet Salyer;
Ray Barrett, Correctional Officer; E.C. Morris,
Deputy Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6681.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Oct. 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-426-R)

David S. Davis, appellant pro se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Murray, No. CA-93-426-R (W.D.Va. June 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Murray, 37 F.3d 1493, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34821, 1994 WL 558248 (4th Cir. 1994).

37 F.3d 1493 (Davis v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.