Davis v. Moody

13 Ga. 188
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1853
DocketNo. 19
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ga. 188 (Davis v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Moody, 13 Ga. 188 (Ga. 1853).

Opinion

By the Court.

Warner, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] The error assigned in this case is, that the Court allowed the plaintiff’s counsel to withdraw a set of interrogatories and commission, for the purpose of having the same re-executed; the interrogatories were excepted to, on the ground that the witness had not fully answered the cross-questions put to him therein.

The discretion of the Court below in allowing the interrogatories to be withdrawn for the purpose of having them re-executed, was properly exercised,' and we shall not control it.

[2.] As a matter of practice in such cases, a certified copy thereof ought always to be filed in the Clerk’s office before the original answers are withdrawn.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Ga. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-moody-ga-1853.