Davis v. Mo. Dep't of Mental Health

548 S.W.3d 322
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 9, 2018
DocketNo. ED 105469
StatusPublished

This text of 548 S.W.3d 322 (Davis v. Mo. Dep't of Mental Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Mo. Dep't of Mental Health, 548 S.W.3d 322 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Calvin Davis and Sherman Davis ("Appellants") filed a Petition for Discrimination and Retaliation against the Missouri Department of Mental Health (the "Department") alleging they were wrongfully terminated in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act (the "MHRA"). The trial court entered partial summary judgment in favor of the Department finding Appellants' claims relating to the unlawful conduct on the part of the Department in its decision to terminate Appellants were dismissed because Appellants failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. Appellants proceeded to trial on their remaining claims of discrimination unrelated to termination. Following a jury trial, the trial court entered judgment pursuant to the jury's verdict denying Appellants' remaining claims. Appellants appeal from the trial court's judgment in favor of the Department. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*323The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 S.W.3d 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-mo-dept-of-mental-health-moctapp-2018.