Davis v. Mitchell
This text of 2 Mart. 115 (Davis v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
All proceedings having been staid against the defendant-his creditors sum-moneci, by advertisement, to meet at the notary's offioe-time given-and the creditors called again to shew cause against the homologation of the pro[119]*119ceedings, and the homologation fairly obtained-it is, perhaps, irregular to proceed for a debt contracted before the call of the creditors. It is not for the Court, at present to say whether the ho-mologation can bypy, if any, by what, means be avoided: but surely, while it stands in force, it must afford protection against all anterior debts, at least, so far as to protect the person in the meantime.
Bail discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Mart. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-mitchell-la-1811.