Davis v. Melnicke
This text of 39 A.D.3d 378 (Davis v. Melnicke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered February 3, 2006, which denied a motion by nonparties Weisz and the Kollel to modify petitioner’s subpoena with respect to three of the seven categories of documents sought, and granted petitioner’s cross motion to compel compliance therewith, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The credibility and good faith of the subpoenaed parties are at issue here, and the materials sought are a legitimate subject of that inquiry. We have considered appellants’ remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Nardelli, Williams and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 A.D.3d 378, 832 N.Y.S.2d 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-melnicke-nyappdiv-2007.