Davis v. Meeker
5 Johns. 354
Opinion
There was no express warranty or fraud proved in this case. The plaintiff below purchased the waggon, on sight, and the assertion of the defendant, that it was worth more than its real value, furnishes no ground of action, (l Johns. Rep. 97. 274. 414. 4 Johns. Rep. 228. 4 Johns. Rep. 421.) The judgment below must be reversed.
Judgment reversed:-.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Meeker, 5 Johns. 354 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).
5 Johns. 354 (Davis v. Meeker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Welling v. Schiller
27 Ill. App. 284 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)
Kennedy v. Richardson
70 Ind. 524 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Scott v. Kittanning Coal Co.
89 Pa. 231 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1879)
Jackson v. Stockbridge
29 Tex. 394 (Texas Supreme Court, 1867)
Veasey v. Doton
85 Mass. 380 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1862)
Page v. Parker
43 N.H. 363 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
Beirne and Burnside v. . Dord
5 N.Y. 95 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)
Kingsbury v. Taylor
29 Me. 508 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1849)
Medbury v. Watson
47 Mass. 246 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1843)
Van Epps v. Harrison
5 Hill & Den. 63 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)
Shepherd v. Temple
3 N.H. 455 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1826)