Davis v. McMichael
This text of 65 Ga. 395 (Davis v. McMichael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a bill in equity, filed in Crawford superior court, in favor of Mrs. Davis, wife of the defendant, Davis, against her husband and W. J. McMichael.
It alleged that Davis resided in Crawford, and McMichael in Upson county.
The bill charged that McMichael was the guardian of complainant and her deceased brother, and as such guardian had received and squandered their money and estate ; that the said McMichael used means belonging to her and her deceased brother, had purchased land in the county of Upson taking the title thereto in his own name, and that her husband had aided and assisted the guardian to misapply said assets, and in the investing the same in the land aforesaid in Upson county—that both her husband and McMichael were insolvent.
She prays that an account may be had with McMichael, her guardian, to ascertain the amount due her in her own right, and as heir-at-law of her deceased brother, and when so found, the. same may be decreed to be a lien on the land in Upson county; and prayed such other and further relief as was equitable. At the appearance term of the bill McMichael pleaded to the jurisdiction of [397]*397Crawford superior court, which the court sustained, and this is the sole complaint here.
The constitution of 1877, sec. 16, par. in, Supplement to Code, § 648, provides that equity cases shall be tried in the county where a defendant resides against whom substantial relief is prayed.
The relief sought in the case at bar is that an account may be taken with her guardian, and when ascertained a decree be had creating a lien on the land in Upson county, where McMichael lived, and the land was situate, to pay her the amount so decreed out of said land. There is no relief prayed against Davis, and whether he acted in the misappropriation of the trust fund or not, the title being in McMichael, his presence is not necessary to the enforcement of complainant’s equity against her guardian and the land now sought to be reached by this proceeding.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 Ga. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-mcmichael-ga-1880.