Davis v. McDonald

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedSeptember 24, 2014
Docket14-7120
StatusUnpublished

This text of Davis v. McDonald (Davis v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. McDonald, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Case: 14-7120 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 09/24/2014

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DONALD R. DAVIS, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. ______________________

2014-7120 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 14-2089, Judge Mary J. Schoelen. ______________________

ON MOTION ______________________

ORDER Donald R. Davis moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Davis is incarcerated. Pursuant to the Prisoner Liti- gation Reform Act of 1995, this court may not authorize the prosecution of an appeal by a prisoner without the prepayment of fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. A prisoner is no longer afforded the alternative of proceeding without Case: 14-7120 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 09/24/2014

payment of filing fees, but must, in time, pay the $500 filing fee in its entirety. When funds exist, an initial partial payment must be made consisting of 20% of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the prison- er’s account or (b) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Thereafter, the prisoner is required to make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month’s in- come credited to the prisoner’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency with custody of the prisoner must forward payments from the prisoner’s account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $500 filing fee is paid in full. Id. Davis has indicated that one of his prior actions or appeals was dismissed because it was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. By separate letter, the custodian of Davis’s prison ac- count is being directed to make the necessary arrange- ments to forward the filing fee to the court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied. FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court s24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Davis v. McDonald, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-mcdonald-cafc-2014.