Davis v. Matthews

Supreme Court

Davis v. Matthews

263 U.S. 686, 44 S. Ct. 179, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2839

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 7, 1924

DocketNo. 118

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 263 U.S. 686 (Davis v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Matthews, 263 U.S. 686, 44 S. Ct. 179, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2839 (1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Central Ver[687]*687mont Ry. Co. v. White, 238 U. S. 507, 509; (2) Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Skaggs, 240 U. S. 66, 70; Spokane & Inland Empire R. R. Co. v. Campbell, 241 U. S. 497, 509; (3) Southern Ry. Co. v. Bennett, 233 U. S. 80, 86; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Holloway, 246 U. S. 525, 529.

Mr. F. L. Willcox and Mr. Thomas W. Davis, with whom Mr. Henry E. Davis was.on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. R. E. Whiting, with whom Mr. D. Gordon Baker and Mr. Felix E. Alley were on the brief, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Central Ver[687]*687mont Ry. Co. v. White, 238 U. S. 507, 509; (2) Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Skaggs, 240 U. S. 66, 70; Spokane & Inland Empire R. R. Co. v. Campbell, 241 U. S. 497, 509; (3) Southern Ry. Co. v. Bennett, 233 U. S. 80, 86; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Holloway, 246 U. S. 525, 529.

Mr. F. L. Willcox and Mr. Thomas W. Davis, with whom Mr. Henry E. Davis was.on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. R. E. Whiting, with whom Mr. D. Gordon Baker and Mr. Felix E. Alley were on the brief, for respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 U.S. 686, 44 S. Ct. 179, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-matthews-scotus-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack