Davis v. Matthews

Supreme Court

Davis v. Matthews

263 U.S. 686, 44 S. Ct. 179, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2839

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 1924·No. No. 118·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Central Ver[687]*687mont Ry. Co. v. White, 238 U. S. 507, 509; (2) Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Skaggs, 240 U. S. 66, 70; Spokane & Inland Empire R. R. Co. v. Campbell, 241 U. S. 497, 509; (3) Southern Ry. Co. v. Bennett, 233 U. S. 80, 86; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Holloway, 246 U. S. 525, 529.

Mr. F. L. Willcox and Mr. Thomas W. Davis, with whom Mr. Henry E. Davis was.on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. R. E. Whiting, with whom Mr. D. Gordon Baker and Mr. Felix E. Alley were on the brief, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Central Ver[687]*687mont Ry. Co. v. White, 238 U. S. 507, 509; (2) Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Skaggs, 240 U. S. 66, 70; Spokane & Inland Empire R. R. Co. v. Campbell, 241 U. S. 497, 509; (3) Southern Ry. Co. v. Bennett, 233 U. S. 80, 86; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Holloway, 246 U. S. 525, 529.

Mr. F. L. Willcox and Mr. Thomas W. Davis, with whom Mr. Henry E. Davis was.on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. R. E. Whiting, with whom Mr. D. Gordon Baker and Mr. Felix E. Alley were on the brief, for respondent.

Davis v. Matthews, 263 U.S. 686, 44 S. Ct. 179, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2839 (1924).

Pincite

263 U.S. 686 (Davis v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related