Davis v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Davis v. Martin

38 S.W. 599, 15 Tex. Civ. App. 62, 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 439

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 9, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 38 S.W. 599 (Davis v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Martin, 38 S.W. 599, 15 Tex. Civ. App. 62, 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 439 (Tex. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion. — The judgment appealed from does not dispose of S.H. Henderson and Smith Coffey, both of whom are parties to the suit, and hence there is no final judgment, and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Martin v. Crow, 28 Tex. 614 [28 Tex. 614]; Simpson v. Bennett, 42 Tex. 241 [42 Tex. 241]; Linn v. Arambould, 55 Tex. 611 [55 Tex. 611], Mignon v. Brinson, 74 Tex. 18; Mills v. Paul, 1 Texas Civ. App. 415[1 Tex. Civ. App. 415]; 23 S.W. Rep., 394.

Appeal dismissed. *Page 63

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion. — The judgment appealed from does not dispose of S.H. Henderson and Smith Coffey, both of whom are parties to the suit, and hence there is no final judgment, and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Martin v. Crow, 28 Tex. 614 [28 Tex. 614]; Simpson v. Bennett, 42 Tex. 241 [42 Tex. 241]; Linn v. Arambould, 55 Tex. 611 [55 Tex. 611], Mignon v. Brinson, 74 Tex. 18; Mills v. Paul, 1 Texas Civ. App. 415[1 Tex. Civ. App. 415]; 23 S.W. Rep., 394.

Appeal dismissed. *Page 63

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 S.W. 599, 15 Tex. Civ. App. 62, 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-martin-texapp-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack