Davis v. Martin

38 S.W. 599, 15 Tex. Civ. App. 62, 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 439
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 9, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion. — The judgment appealed from does not dispose of S.H. Henderson and Smith Coffey, both of whom are parties to the suit, and hence there is no final judgment, and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Martin v. Crow, 28 Tex. 614 [28 Tex. 614]; Simpson v. Bennett, 42 Tex. 241 [42 Tex. 241]; Linn v. Arambould, 55 Tex. 611 [55 Tex. 611], Mignon v. Brinson, 74 Tex. 18; Mills v. Paul, 1 Texas Civ. App. 415[1 Tex. Civ. App. 415]; 23 S.W. Rep., 394.

Appeal dismissed. *Page 63

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Martin, 38 S.W. 599, 15 Tex. Civ. App. 62, 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 439 (Tex. Ct. App. 1896).

38 S.W. 599 (Davis v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yerby v. Heineken & Vogelsang
209 S.W. 835 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. Tudle
171 S.W. 797 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
McCarty v. Gray
158 S.W. 1154 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)