Davis v. . Marshall

9 N.C. 59
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1822·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hall, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

It seems that the Appellant made no effort, cither to bring up the appeal himself, or cause it to he done by any other person. He depended upon the Clerk of the County Court, he says, to bring it up, because (as the Clerk admits) he had been in the habit of bringing up all appeals taken from the County Court, but omitted, through forgetfulness, to bring up this one. Other instances of forgetfulness like this, to which the human character is liable, particularly as a good deal might be depending upon it, should have taught the Appellant the necessity of attending to the business himself. In cases of such negligence, this Court cannot interfere, and however much it may regret it, it must say that the writ of certiorañ cannot be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. . Marshall, 9 N.C. 59 (N.C. 1822).

9 N.C. 59 (Davis v. . Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barton, Ex Parte
70 N.C. 130 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1874)
Howell v. . Barnes
64 N.C. 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1870)
Steele v. . Harris
4 N.C. 440 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1816)
Brickell v. . Bass
2 N.C. 137 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1794)