Davis v. Marcotte

Ohio Supreme Court

Davis v. Marcotte

949 N.E.2d 15, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 17, 2011

Docket2011-0715

StatusPublished

This text of 949 N.E.2d 15 (Davis v. Marcotte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Marcotte, 949 N.E.2d 15, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 10AP-361, 2011-Ohio-1189. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.

Upon review of the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction, it is evident that Douglas J. Raymond has not filed a timely motion for admission pro hac vice pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Douglas J. Raymond is stricken from the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction for failure to comply with S.CtPrac.R. 1.2 and Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6)(a)-(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 10AP-361, 2011-Ohio-1189. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.

Upon review of the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction, it is evident that Douglas J. Raymond has not filed a timely motion for admission pro hac vice pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Douglas J. Raymond is stricken from the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction for failure to comply with S.CtPrac.R. 1.2 and Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6)(a)-(e).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

949 N.E.2d 15, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-marcotte-ohio-2011.