Davis v. Marcotte

949 N.E.2d 15, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 17, 2011·No. 2011-0715·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 10AP-361, 2011-Ohio-1189. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.

Upon review of the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction, it is evident that Douglas J. Raymond has not filed a timely motion for admission pro hac vice pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Douglas J. Raymond is stricken from the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction for failure to comply with S.CtPrac.R. 1.2 and Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6)(a)-(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Marcotte, 949 N.E.2d 15, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525 (Ohio 2011).

949 N.E.2d 15 (Davis v. Marcotte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.