Davis v. Manuel
This text of 99 So. 3d 658 (Davis v. Manuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Mark Davis, et al.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 2009-6074; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2012-C-0577.
Granted. Because the court of appeal modified the judgment of the district court in a civil matter with one judge dissenting, La. Const, art. V, § 8(B) mandates that the ease “shall be reargued before a panel of at least five judges prior to rendition of judgment, and a majority must concur to render judgment.” Accordingly, the writ is granted, and the case is remanded to the court of appeal for re-argument before a panel of at least five judges.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 So. 3d 658, 2012 La. LEXIS 3071, 2012 WL 5395348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-manuel-la-2012.