Davis v. Mabus

Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Mabus

575 F. App'x 201

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 23, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1120

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 575 F. App'x 201 (Davis v. Mabus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Mabus, 575 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonah C. Davis appeals the district court’s order dismissing the complaint Davis filed concerning his civilian employment by the United States Navy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [202]*202error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Mabus, No. 2:12-cv-00467-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2013; Dec. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jonah C. Davis appeals the district court’s order dismissing the complaint Davis filed concerning his civilian employment by the United States Navy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [202]*202error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Mabus, No. 2:12-cv-00467-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2013; Dec. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 F. App'x 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-mabus-ca4-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack