Davis v. Lester (In re Davis)

97 B.R. 292
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia
DecidedFebruary 27, 1989
DocketBankruptcy No. 7-88-01204-BKC-HPA; Adv. Nos. 7-88-0279 to 7-88-0286, 7-88-0299 to 7-88-0300
StatusPublished

This text of 97 B.R. 292 (Davis v. Lester (In re Davis)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Lester (In re Davis), 97 B.R. 292 (E.D. Va. 1989).

Opinion

JOINT MEMORANDUM OPINION

H. CLYDE PEARSON, Chief Judge.

The within complaints were filed by Ted G. Davis, debtor, seeking to avoid judgment liens of the defendants upon real estate which he owns in Buchanan County, Virginia.

From the evidence in the consolidated hearing, it appeared that debtor, while trading as T. Davis Coal Company, employed defendants in the business and when their earned wages were not paid, all of these defendants proceeded to obtain judgments for these wages in the Buchanan County State Court and had the judgments docketed in the Clerk’s Office, there[293]*293by becoming liens upon real estate owned in that county by the debtor. The judgments were rendered in April and May, 1987.

On July 26,1988, debtor filed his Chapter 7 liquidation petition in this court. He also set apart in his homestead deed $6,000.00 equity in the real estate. These complaints were filed under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f) seeking a determination of and avoidance of these judgment liens because they are alleged to impair the homestead exemption of the debtor in his real estate equity.

Virginia Code § 34-4 provides the homestead exemption rights of householders which exempts property from claims except those included in § 34-5. In § 34-5(2) such exemption excludes services rendered by a laboring person’s wages and § 34-5(5) excludes rent.

In the case of In re Barnes, 29 B.R. 677 (Bankr.W.D.Va.1983), this court held that § 522(f) excludes rent claims. This holding was followed in In re Shines, 39 B.R. 879 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1984) and In re Snow, 92 B.R. 154 (D.C.W.D.Va.1988). The same principal is applicable to § 34-5(2) as the exemption relates to wages. The exemption is not applicable to judgment liens for wages and the prayer of the complaints should be denied and the judgment liens shall remain in full force and effect.

An appropriate Order will enter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. McCarthy (In Re Barnes)
29 B.R. 677 (W.D. Virginia, 1983)
Snow v. Green (In Re Snow)
92 B.R. 154 (W.D. Virginia, 1988)
In Re Shines
39 B.R. 879 (E.D. Virginia, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 B.R. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-lester-in-re-davis-vaed-1989.