Davis v. Lehman

105 So. 3d 645, 2013 WL 264758, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 990
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 2013·No. No. 1D12-2347·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Bruno v. A.E. Handy & Assoc., Inc., 787 So.2d 251, 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (contrasting default judgment with interlocutory “simple default” that contained no award of damages or other affirmative relief). All pending motions are denied as moot.

PADOVANO, ROWE, and RAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Lehman, 105 So. 3d 645, 2013 WL 264758, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 990 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

105 So. 3d 645 (Davis v. Lehman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruno v. AE Handy & Associates, Inc.
787 So. 2d 251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)