Davis v. Knipp

Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Knipp

239 F. App'x 826

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2007·No. No. 07-1505·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark Davis, M.D., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for default judgment and dismissing his civil action in regard to a peer review process against all defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Knipp, No. 1:07-cv-00388-JFM, 2007 WL 1308843 (D. Md. filed May 1, 2007; entered May 2, 2007). We dispense with oral [827]*827argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mark Davis, M.D., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for default judgment and dismissing his civil action in regard to a peer review process against all defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Knipp, No. 1:07-cv-00388-JFM, 2007 WL 1308843 (D. Md. filed May 1, 2007; entered May 2, 2007). We dispense with oral [827]*827argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Davis v. Knipp, 239 F. App'x 826 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

239 F. App'x 826 (Davis v. Knipp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.