Davis v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

86 S.W. 995, 75 Ark. 165, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 553
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 22, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 86 S.W. 995 (Davis v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 86 S.W. 995, 75 Ark. 165, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 553 (Ark. 1905).

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) The court erred. When the name of a station is called, and the train soon thereafter is stopped, the passenger may reasonably conclude that the train has stopped at the station, and may endeavor to get off, unless the circumstances and indications make it manifest that the proper and usual stopping place has not been reached. Smith v. Georgia Pacific Ry. 7 L. R. A. 323; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Farr, 70 Ark. 264; Johnson v. Ry. 59 Ark. 122, and many authorities cited in appellant’s brief.

The question of liability under the facts should have been submitted to the jury upon proper instructions as to the duties and obligations of appellant and appellee, respectively.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steptoe v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
177 S.W. 417 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1915)
Midland Valley R. v. Page
182 F. 125 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1910)
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Glossup
114 S.W. 247 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.W. 995, 75 Ark. 165, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-kansas-city-southern-railway-co-ark-1905.