Davis v. Jenkins
14 Ind. 572
Opinion
The only error assigned is that no bill of particulars was filed with the complaint. There was no demurrer; no regular motion for a new trial. The suit is for work and labor, and the complaint contains in the body of it a statement of the kind of service, and time for which compensation is claimed. Under the circumstances, this is, sufficient.
The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Jenkins, 14 Ind. 572 (Ind. 1860).
14 Ind. 572 (Davis v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cannon v. Castleman
55 N.E. 111 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
Chamness v. Chamness
53 Ind. 301 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)