Davis v. Jenkins

Indiana Supreme Court

Davis v. Jenkins

14 Ind. 572

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 23, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 Ind. 572 (Davis v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Jenkins, 14 Ind. 572 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cwriam.

The only error assigned is that no bill of particulars was filed with the complaint. There was no demurrer; no regular motion for a new trial. The suit is for work and labor, and the complaint contains in the body of it a statement of the kind of service, and time for which compensation is claimed. Under the circumstances, this is, sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cwriam.

The only error assigned is that no bill of particulars was filed with the complaint. There was no demurrer; no regular motion for a new trial. The suit is for work and labor, and the complaint contains in the body of it a statement of the kind of service, and time for which compensation is claimed. Under the circumstances, this is, sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Ind. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-jenkins-ind-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack