Davis v. Hyman

Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Hyman

201 F. App'x 955

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2006·No. 06-1382·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Lorenzo Davis appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hyman, No. 3:05-cv-00519-REP; BK-04-34074-DOT (E.D.Va. Mar. 7, 2006). In light of this disposition, we deny Davis’ motions for stay and for preparation of a transcript at government expense. We grant Davis’ motion to amend his informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Lorenzo Davis appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hyman, No. 3:05-cv-00519-REP; BK-04-34074-DOT (E.D.Va. Mar. 7, 2006). In light of this disposition, we deny Davis’ motions for stay and for preparation of a transcript at government expense. We grant Davis’ motion to amend his informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Davis v. Hyman, 201 F. App'x 955 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

201 F. App'x 955 (Davis v. Hyman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.