Davis v. Humbarger
1911 OK 17, 117 P. 199, 27 Okla. 781, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 54
Opinion
The defendant in error has moved that this proceeding in error be dismissed for the reason that since the same was instituted the controversy between the parties hereto has been settled and the question here presented for review is now hypothetical. Counsel for plaintiff in error concedes such to be the facts. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Humbarger, 1911 OK 17, 117 P. 199, 27 Okla. 781, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 54 (Okla. 1911).
1911 OK 17 (Davis v. Humbarger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Payne, County Treas. v. Jones
1944 OK 86 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1944)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State
1914 OK 416 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)