Davis v. Hillsborough County
This text of Davis v. Hillsborough County (Davis v. Hillsborough County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JONATHAN G. DAVIS,
Appellant,
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-1827
January 16, 2026
Appeal from the County Court for Hillsborough County; Richard A. Weis, Judge.
Payton S. McCann and Michael R. DeFeudis of McCann Legal, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.
Kenneth C. Pope, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Tampa, for Appellee.
KHOUZAM, Judge.
We treat this direct appeal of a nonfinal prejudgment civil contempt order as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c) ("If a party seeks an improper remedy, the cause must be treated as if the proper remedy had been sought; provided that it will not be the responsibility of the court to seek the proper remedy."); see, e.g., Menke v. Wendell, 188 So. 3d 869, 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ("[A] prejudgment civil contempt order entered in an ongoing proceeding is subject to certiorari review."). As the petition fails to establish a departure from the essential requirements of the law, we must deny it. See Menke, 188 So. 3d at 871. Denied.
BLACK and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
__________________________
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Davis v. Hillsborough County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-hillsborough-county-fladistctapp-2026.