Davis v. Hill

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Davis v. Hill

108 N.E.2d 279, 329 Mass. 764

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedOctober 9, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 108 N.E.2d 279 (Davis v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Hill, 108 N.E.2d 279, 329 Mass. 764 (Mass. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree affirmed. The defendants’ brief describes this case as a bill in equity by members of one church against the officers of another church for a determination of title to certain real estate. After hearing a final decree was entered dismissing the bill. The plaintiffs appealed. The evidence is not reported. There is no finding of material facts. The only question now open is whether as matter of law the decree dismissing the bill would be permissible on the pleadings. Dondis v. Lash, 283 Mass. 353, 354. It is obvious that such a decree could be entered on the pleadings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree affirmed. The defendants’ brief describes this case as a bill in equity by members of one church against the officers of another church for a determination of title to certain real estate. After hearing a final decree was entered dismissing the bill. The plaintiffs appealed. The evidence is not reported. There is no finding of material facts. The only question now open is whether as matter of law the decree dismissing the bill would be permissible on the pleadings. Dondis v. Lash, 283 Mass. 353, 354. It is obvious that such a decree could be entered on the pleadings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 N.E.2d 279, 329 Mass. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-hill-mass-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack