Davis v. Heye

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Davis v. Heye

743 So. 2d 1200, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14631, 1999 WL 999996

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 1999·No. No. 99-2569·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss the petition for writ of cer-tiorari because no order was rendered from which certiorari can be taken and vest jurisdiction in this court. The circuit court only pronounced an oral ruling. See State v. Siegel, 662 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also In re Guardianship of A.P., 644 So.2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Gregg v. State, 643 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

DAUKSCH, COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss the petition for writ of cer-tiorari because no order was rendered from which certiorari can be taken and vest jurisdiction in this court. The circuit court only pronounced an oral ruling. See State v. Siegel, 662 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also In re Guardianship of A.P., 644 So.2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Gregg v. State, 643 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

DAUKSCH, COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Davis v. Heye, 743 So. 2d 1200, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14631, 1999 WL 999996 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

743 So. 2d 1200 (Davis v. Heye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related