Davis v. Herrick
This text of 93 A. 1083 (Davis v. Herrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action of trespass to recover damages for an assault and battery tried at the January term, 1914, of the Supreme Judicial Court for the County of Somerset.
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $5 and the case is before the Law Court upon plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial, because the damages assessed are inadequate.
A careful examination of the evidence satisfies us that the testimony justifies the finding of the jury. The question of liability and the amount, if liable, were for the jury, and finding nothing in the case to warrant setting aside the verdict for the cause assigned, the entry will be motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 A. 1083, 113 Me. 565, 1915 Me. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-herrick-me-1915.