Davis v. Henry
63 Miss. 110
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.'
The amended plea of tender filed by Davis should have been traversed. If the facts averred in .it were true, the, attachment was wrongfully sued out, and appellee and the sureties on his bond were liable not only for cost, but also for damages. A distress for rent after tender of the amount due is unlawful, unless there has been a subsequent demand and refusal. Taylor on Landlord and Tenant, §§ 566, 573; Hunter v. Le Conte, 6 Cow. 728; Smithy. Goodwin, 4 B. & Ad. 413.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Henry, 63 Miss. 110 (Mich. 1885).
63 Miss. 110 (Davis v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hunter v. Le Conte
6 Cow. 728 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)