Davis v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
This text of 25 A.D.2d 604 (Davis v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Special Term correctly held that the thawing of pipes in a house off the premises described in the garage liability policy was not an operation “necessary or incidental” to the garage business being operated by plaintiff. It was error, however, to dismiss the complaint in this action for a declaratory judgment merely because plaintiff was not entitled to the declaration he sought. (Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N Y 2d 317, 334.) The order should be modified by declaring that defendant is not obligated to take over the defense of the action brought against plaintiff nor to pay any judgment which may be rendered against him in that action. (Appeal from order of Chau[605]*605tauqua Special Term dismissing the complaint in an action on a garage liability policy.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 604, 267 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-co-nyappdiv-1966.