Davis v. Hareford
265 U.S. 571, 44 S. Ct. 458, 68 L. Ed. 1184, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2643
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334; St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co. v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240, 241; Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179, 181; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Hareford, 265 U.S. 571, 44 S. Ct. 458, 68 L. Ed. 1184, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2643 (1924).
265 U.S. 571 (Davis v. Hareford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 326 (Supreme Court, 1913)
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Shepherd
240 U.S. 240 (Supreme Court, 1916)
Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal
251 U.S. 179 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
261 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1923)