Davis v. Hannan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis v. Hannan

271 A.D.2d 635, 707 N.Y.S.2d 347, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 635 (Davis v. Hannan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Hannan, 271 A.D.2d 635, 707 N.Y.S.2d 347, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered April 7, 1999, which, upon the granting of the plaintiff’s application, made at the close of evidence, for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, and upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff Eleanor Davis damages in the sum of $751,900 ($59,400 for lost earnings, $186,500 for past pain and suffering, and $506,000 for future pain and suffering), is in favor of the plaintiff and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly allowed into evidence the opinion testimony of the plaintiff’s psychiatrist (see, Kravitz v Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Ctr., 113 AD2d 577).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered April 7, 1999, which, upon the granting of the plaintiff’s application, made at the close of evidence, for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, and upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff Eleanor Davis damages in the sum of $751,900 ($59,400 for lost earnings, $186,500 for past pain and suffering, and $506,000 for future pain and suffering), is in favor of the plaintiff and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly allowed into evidence the opinion testimony of the plaintiff’s psychiatrist (see, Kravitz v Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Ctr., 113 AD2d 577).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 635, 707 N.Y.S.2d 347, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-hannan-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack