Davis v. Hambly

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 202, 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1838
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 1924·No. No. 795·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FUNK, P. J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

Original action in the Common Pleas to set-aside as fraudulent a deed made to defendant, Della Hambly, by her husband against whom plaintiff’s deceased husband had a judgment. Plaintiff, Jane D. Davies, was the executrix of her said deceased husband. Judgment was rendered for defendant and plaintiff appealed. Held:

1. It was competent for defendant to testify at the trial, even though plaintiff w'as an executrix, for the reason that 11459 GC. provides “Nothing in this section shall apply to . . . actions or proceedings involving the valdity of a deed.”

2. It appears from the evidence that defendant was the equitable owner of the real estate in question. A judgment creditor levying upon property has a lien on only such interest as the judgment debtor may have therein. Therefore plaintiff has no lien.

3. In order for plaintiff to obtain a decree she must prove that the transfer was in bad faith, that there was an insufficient consideration and also that defendant had knowledge of a fraudulent intent. This, plaintiff has failed to do. Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Hambly, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 202, 1924 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1838 (Ohio Ct. App. 1924).

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 202 (Davis v. Hambly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Underwood v. Lapp
29 Ohio Law. Abs. 582 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1939)