Davis v. Hadden

41 S.E. 608, 115 Ga. 466, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 455
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 30, 1902·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

A set-off at law can be had only in cases where the demands attempted to be set off are mutual and held by the parties in their own right. It follows that a defendant sued in his individual capacity can not set off against the plaintiff’s demand a claim that he in a representative capacity as executor holds against the plaintiff. Civil Code, §§3746, 3747. Daniel v. Bush, 80 Ga. 218.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Hadden, 41 S.E. 608, 115 Ga. 466, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 455 (Ga. 1902).

41 S.E. 608 (Davis v. Hadden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shingler v. Furst
168 S.E. 557 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Sheffield v. Preacher
165 S.E. 742 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)