Davis v. Gurley
This text of 44 Ga. 582 (Davis v. Gurley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action brought by the plaintiff-against the defendants, containing two counts, one for interfering with his right of common of pasturage, on lands granted by the State in the county of Union, and the other to recover damages for killing his stock. There was a demurrer to the declaration which the Court overruled, and, in our judgment, properly overruled. On the trial of the case, after hearing the evidence and charge of the Court, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $125 00. A motion was made for a new trial, which was overruled by the Court, and the defendants excepted. There is no evidence in the record that the defendants killed the plaintiff’s stock, which would, under the law, authorize the jury to find a verdict against them. That the unlawful interference with one’s right of common [585]*585of pasturage is actionable when the right exists, is undoubtedly true, but the difficulty with the plaintiff in this case is, that the evidence in the record does not establish such right ■of common of pasturage against the defendants 5 or, if it does, that the defendants have unlawfully interfered with it.
Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Ga. 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-gurley-ga-1872.