Davis v. Guise
226 So. 2d 363
Opinion
The points presented on this appeal by the appellants involve factual issues which were resolved against the appellants by the trial court. The record on appeal does not contain a transcript of the testimony which was before the trial court. We are, therefore, unable on the basis of the record before this court to conclude that the appellants have demonstrated the existence of reversible error. For this reason the judgment appealed from is affirmed. See City of South Bay v. Armstrong, Fla.App. 1966, 188 So.2d 21.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. Guise, 226 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
226 So. 2d 363 (Davis v. Guise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of South Bay v. Armstrong
188 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)