Davis v. Guise

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Davis v. Guise

226 So. 2d 363

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 17, 1969

DocketNo. 2547

StatusPublished

This text of 226 So. 2d 363 (Davis v. Guise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Guise, 226 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The points presented on this appeal by the appellants involve factual issues which were resolved against the appellants by the trial court. The record on appeal does not contain a transcript of the testimony which was before the trial court. We are, therefore, unable on the basis of the record before this court to conclude that the appellants have demonstrated the existence of reversible error. For this reason the judgment appealed from is affirmed. See City of South Bay v. Armstrong, Fla.App. 1966, 188 So.2d 21.

Affirmed.

McCAIN, REED, and OWEN, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The points presented on this appeal by the appellants involve factual issues which were resolved against the appellants by the trial court. The record on appeal does not contain a transcript of the testimony which was before the trial court. We are, therefore, unable on the basis of the record before this court to conclude that the appellants have demonstrated the existence of reversible error. For this reason the judgment appealed from is affirmed. See City of South Bay v. Armstrong, Fla.App. 1966, 188 So.2d 21.

Affirmed.

McCAIN, REED, and OWEN, JJ-, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 So. 2d 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-guise-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack